New BIFMA Chair Standard
Micom Laboratories is happy to inform you that BIFMA just released its new version of BIFMA X5.1 for office chairs. The loads and forces used in this standard are based on the 95th percentile male body mass. This value went from 225 lbs, in the previous edition, to 253 lbs in the new edition and the population’s body mass increases. Your chairs will have to be re-tested for the following tests as they changed:
- Base test: the stems inserted in the base to hold the casters are now required for support: the stress distribution will be changed considerably.
- Swivel cycling test: Load on sample while cycling increased
- Seating impact test : The drop height was increased from 25mm to 30 mm (1″ to 1.2″) which yields a higher impact force on the seat. Same test bag mass as before with some slight modification to the bag (metal ring on the top part).
- Rear Stability test : New test completely different from the previous version. Similar to ISO 21015. The test is now performed using a stack of disks rather than a monolythic mass. For type III chairs the test forces applied to the highest disk varies with seat height. Results to date seems to demontrate that the test is more difficult to comply with than before for type I and II chairs.
- Arm strength test – Vertical : Only pull down is now allowed; no push down. The forces were reduced from 200 to 169 lbf (functional) and from 300 to 253 lbf (proof) .
- Caster/chair base durability test : increased load
- Footrest Static Load Test (new)
- Footrest durability cyclic : Additional deflection parameters introduced for the first 500 cycles.
- Out Stop Tests for Chairs with Manually Adjustable Seat Depth: increased load.
For a complete test-by-test comparison please follow this LINK
BIFMA is currently working on updating its BIFMA X5.4 standard which should be released in 2012.
For more information about these new services and our coating testing services, please don’t hesitate to contact us.
Micom is a third party material testing laboratory accredited by the Standards Council of Canada, CGSB and ISTA.
All of the information and opinions contained in this blog are made with the information, and the understanding that we have reviewed at the time of publishing. However, despite our efforts, we do not offer any guarantee of their accuracy, thoroughness of our investigation or validity. The author of this blog is not liable for any inaccuracies or any losses or damages that may result from the use of the information or data contained herein. This blog has not been reviewed or verified for its accuracy by any peer group associates prior to publication.