skip to Main Content
Search float button

BIFMA X5.9 Association Ballot

BIFMA has been reviewing its “ANSI/BIFMA X5.9-2012 – Storage Units – Tests” Standards.  BIFMA’s review process hit a new yardstick last Friday as it was the closing date for the association ballot on the standard draft.  You will find below our comments in the ballot we did submit. Essentially, our comments are editorial in nature since we participate in the committee’s writing activities and that our technical comments were addressed as the new draft was being reviewed.

The second table below is a test-by-test comparison between the current and the proposed draft standard.  This will hopefully help you follow where the standard is heading and how it might impact your products.  This review follows the revision of ANSI/BIFMA X5.5-2014 for desk and table products as well as ANSI/BIFMA X5.6-2016 Panel Systems.  Anything could change, however we expect the approval process leading to a published standard to be completed within the next 12 months.

On another front CGSB recently published its CAN/CGSB 44.227 standard – Free-standing office desk/table, storage products and components and CAN/CGSB 44.229 standard – Interconnecting Panel Systems and Supported Components.

OUR BIFMA X5.9 ASSOCIATION BALLOT  COMMENTS

12-345-6
CommentorClause No./

Subclause
No./

Annex

(e.g. 3.1)

Paragraph/

Figure/Table/
Note

(e.g. Table 1)

Type of comment1Comment (justification for
change) by the Commentor
Proposed change by the
Commentor
RC2.5.23rd bulletteAs per table 1, the clear
height shall be limited to 12”, not 18”.
“In the case where there is
a unit bottom the maximum clear height value used for the clear space
calculation shall not exceed 305 mm (12 in.).”
RC12.3b)ed Replace paragraph “x)” by “b)”
RC13.3d)edForces in English units
shall read “lbf”, not “lbs.”
“Typically when forces
exceed 267 N [60 lbf.]”
RCP.68Footnote 2 Forces in English units
shall read “lbf”, not “lbs.”
“This force, which may be as
high as 50-60 lbf”
RC15.2.2a)edForces in English units
shall read “lbf”, not “lbs.”
“Typically when forces
exceed 267 N [60 lbf.]”
RC15.3.2b)edForces in English units
shall read “lbf”, not “lbs.”
“Typically when forces
exceed 267 N [60 lbf.]”
RC17.7.3NoteedForces in English units
shall read “lbf”, not “lbs.”
“Typically when forces
exceed 267 N [60 lbf.]”
RC17.8.3NoteedForces in English units
shall read “lbf”, not “lbs.”
“Typically when forces
exceed 267 N [60 lbf.]”

TEST-BY-TEST COMPARISON BETWEEN ANSI/BIFMA X5.9-2012 AND BIFMA X5.9 ASSOCIATION BALLOT – OCTOBER 9, 2017

# testBIFMA X5.9 Association
Ballot – October 9, 2017
ComparisonConclusion
 TitleProtocol title is now  “Storage Units” Whereas it used to be “Storage Units –
Tests”
 
1ScopeReference to “X5.3  Vertical Files – Tests” was removed 
2DefinitionsMore comprehensive language
for “Case” definition
 
2DefinitionsNew definition for Lateral
File and Vertical File
 
3.1.2GeneralNew test category for  Stability tests 
3.1.4GeneralMore comprehensive language
for worst-case scenario selection
 
3.5TolerancesMore comprehensive language
for tolerances
 
3.9Cycles RatesModified language for cycle  rates 
3.11Temperature and Humidity ConsiderationsMore comprehensive language
for temperature and Humidity considerations
 
Table 1 Unit Bottom height is now
limited to 12″ whereas it used to be 18″
 
Table 1 New category for Video  Displays 
Table 2 Table 2 is now a loading
guide whereas it used to be the loading parameters for Video Displays
 
4Functional Load Tests   4.2
& 4.3
More comprehensive language
and figure added for irregular shaped units.
Same test
No retest required
Proof Load Tests   4.4 & 4.5
Test protocol now calls for  Proof Load on all surfaces while performing the Concentrated Proof Load testDifferent test protocol
Retesting required
4.6.3Extendible Element Proof Load TestsSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
5Leg/Glide Assembly Strength Test (no casters)Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
6Racking Resistance Test (no casters)Test is now limited to units
weighing 600 lb. or less
No retest required
7.1Top Load Ease Cycle TestMore specific language for  Extendible elements break-in period and  how extendible elements and surfaces shall be loaded during test.  Permitted use of force based cycling deviceDifferent test protocol
Retesting required
7.2Drop test – Dynamic – for Units with Seat SurfacesMore specific language for
how extendible elements and surfaces shall be loaded during test
Different test protocol
Retesting required
7.3Durability Test for Units with Seating Surface – Cyclic ImpactMore specific language for
how extendible elements and surfaces shall be loaded during test
Different test protocol
Retesting required
8.1Separation Test for Tall Storage Units with Vertically Attached
or  Stackable Components
Wording correction: test
applies to units > 1062 mm (42 in.) high whereas height used to be
written 1219 mm (42 in.)
If your lab works with
English units, no retest required.
If your lab works with Metric units retesting may be required.
8.2Upward Impact Force Disengagement Test for Storage UnitsThe unit shall withstand the
functional loads in the Acceptance level whereas it used to be the proof  loads
Acceptance Level is easier  to comply
No retest required
8.3Upward Force Static Disengagement Test for Wall Mounted ComponentsMinor test title change
The unit shall withstand the functional loads in the Acceptance level whereas
it used to be the proof loads
Acceptance Level is easier  to comply
No retest required
9.2Horizontal Force Stability Test for Tall Storage Products
(>42″)
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
9.3Stability Test for Type l Units with at least one Extendible ElementMinor language changeSame test
No retest required
9.4Stability Test for Type I Storage Units with Multiple Ext elementsFigure added to test
protocol
Same test
No retest required
9.5Stability Test for Type II Storage Units having extendible elementsSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
9.6Vertical Force Stability Test for Storage Units (for units >42
inches)
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
9.7Stability Test for Pedestals/Storage Units with Seat SurfacesTest is now limited to units
< 38 inches high
Same test
No retest required
9.8Incline Stability TestNew test
This test applies to units having a depth less than 10″ or extendible
elements without outstop
New test
Test required for units units having a depth less than 10″ or extendible
elements without outstop
10Storage Unit Drop Test (no type II, no casters)Minor language changeSame test
No retest required
11Movement Durability Test for Mobile Storage UnitsTolerances added to
obstacles
Cycle rate range is extended 10 +2,-6 CPM whereas is used to be 10+2
Different test protocol
retesting may be required.
Check with your lab
12Extendible Element Rebound TestTest name changed to
Extendible Element Rebound Test whereas it used to be Rebound Test
Same test
No retest required
13Extendible Element Retention Impact and Durability (Out Stop) TestsSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
14.2 Force Test for Extendible
Element Locks
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
14.3 Force Test for Door LocksSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
14.4 Locking Mechanism Cycle Test
for All Locks
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
15.2 Cycle Tests for Extendible
Elements Deeper than Wide
Minor language change. Test
now applies to extendible elements with equal width and depth dimensions
Same test
No retest required
15.3Cycle Tests for Extendible Elements Wider than DeepWide pulls are now defined
as > 18″ whereas they used to be > 12″
Test is easier to comply for  wide pulls < 18″
No retest required
15.4Cycle Test for Low Height DrawersUsed to be test 15.5 in
previous version
Same test
No retest required
16Interlock Strength TestSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.2Strength Test for Vertically Hinged, Bi-fold, and Vertically Receding
Doors
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.3 Hinge Override Test for
Vertically Hinged Doors
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.4 Vertical Receding Doors
Strength Test
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.5 Horizontal Receding doors
Strength Test
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.6Wear and Fatigue Tests for Hinged, Horizontally Sliding, and Tambour
Doors
Wide pulls are now defined
as > 18″ whereas they used to be > 12″
Test is easier to comply for  wide pulls < 18″
No retest required
17.7Wear and fatigue test for vertical receding doorSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.8Wear and fatigue test for horizontal receding doors  Wide pulls are now defined
as > 18″ whereas they used to be > 12″
Test is easier to comply for  wide pulls < 18″
No retest required
17.9Vertical and Horizontal Receding Door Out Stop Test – Cyclic Impact
& Durability
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.10Slam Closed Test for Vertically Hinged and Vertically Receding DoorsSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.11Drop Test for Horizontally Hinged and Horizontally Receding Doors –
Cyclic
Same as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.12Slam Test for Doors which Free Fall Open or ClosedSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
17.13Slam Open and Closed Test for Doors which Do Not Free FallSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
18Clothes Rails Static Loading TestSame as beforeSame test
No retest required
19Latch TestUsed be test 17.14 and
applicable to doors only.
Now applies to doors and extendible elements equipped with latch
Retest is required for
extendible elements equipped with latch where the latch was not tested in
conjunction with the wear and fatigue test
20Pull force testMinor language changeSame test
No retest required
Dropped tests   
15.4Horizontal Cycle Test for Television/Video Display Terminal Extendible
Elements
Test dropped, video display
units are now covered by tests 15.2 and 15.3 depending on video display
dimensions.
Retest required for video  display units (test #15)
Different test protocol
17.14Door latch testTest was renamed to
“Latch test” in section 19
No retest required for doors  equipped with latch
19Swivel Cycle Test for Tel/Video Display Terminal SurfacesTest dropped 
Note 1: The statements made in this document are made on a general  basis strictly to help manufacturers and other interested parties to get an  overview of how this new standard’s version could potentially impact product
compliance requirements and status.   Re-testing may or may not be required on specific configurations
despite the statements made in the above document which only represent Micom  Laboratories Inc.’s opinion.  Specific  re-testing requirements should be based on a case-by-case analysis and cannot  be unilaterally decided strictly based on the statements made above; they  should be used strictly as general guidelines.  Whether re-testing needs to be performed  needs to be decided Manufacturers or their customers.

Learn more about Micom’s BIFMA testing services. If you have any questions about BIFMA testing, we invite you to contact us today. 


Disclaimer

All of the information and opinions  contained in this blog are made with the information, and the understanding  that we have reviewed at the time of publishing.  However, despite our  efforts, we do not offer any guarantee of their accuracy, thoroughness of our  investigation or validity. The author of this blog is not liable for any  inaccuracies or any losses or damages that may result from the use of the
information or data contained herein. This blog has not been reviewed or  verified for its accuracy by any peer group associates prior to publication.

Back To Top