Last Friday PWGSC held and enlarged GOFAC teleconference meeting on Office furniture. The main topics were:
- Various levels of technical requirements (Product description, CGSB, BIFMA…)
- Government specific requirements
- Office seating Supply Arrangement (SA)
- Panel systems SA
PWGSC also had the following specific issues they wanted to discuss:
- Do any of the specifications used by the Government of Canada create impediments for bidding? If so, which specification documents are they, what are the impediments they create, and do you have proposed solutions?
- Can the specifications be more generic? If so, how?
- Can the specifications be written differently from the prescriptive style currently used, and if so, which specification documents can be revised, and how can they be written?
- If using a less prescriptive style, what are the technical risks for Canada?
- How can the specifications be written, and/or what style or approach can be used by PWGSC to make the requirement definition and procurement process for office seating and panels easier for our clients. (i.e.: How can the specifications be written to permit ranges, and allow clients to select an option within the range?)
The group discussed the cumbersomeness of having various levels of technical requirements. We recommended that when there is a national standard the government should not add technical requirements in their Product Descriptions documents. PWGSC commented that it was duly noted.
The CGSB Qualified Product Listing (QPL) relevancy was discussed and CGSB received support from some manufacturer and us. It was pointed out to PWGSC that using the QPL would make their life much easier as they would not have to perform a technical review for each manufacturer. We believe PWGSC will still be accepting direct filing as well as the QPL use for establishing compliance.
The incoming PSA for chairs was discussed including the timing for issuing the Request for Supply Arrangements (RFSA). The draft version of the chair specification that will be part of the next SA will be posted on Merx in two weeks for comments. The RFSA should hit the streets by mid-June with a 45 days closing date. PWGSC will still call up the CGSB 44.232 standard and the BIFMA standard. PWGSC will also be requiring more green requirements but they were not specific as to what exactly they will be looking for. There will be two SA put in place. The first one will be with a fixed closing date and one month later a second one will be put in place that will be an open ended i.e. any manufacturer can come in when they want or add products to its offering.
We were informed there will be a SA put in place next fall for panel systems. PWGSC did not specify when the RFSA will come out but for the SA to be in place for next fall, September would seem to be a reasonable guess. PWGSC will call up the CGSB 44.229 standard and the BIFMA standard. PWGSC will look in the possibility of relaxing their requirements for Flammability testing (tunnel). PWGSC will also be requiring more green requirements but they were not specific as to what exactly they will be looking for.
PWGSC has recently published its Fit-up standard.
This standard will impact workstation dimensions and features and should therefore impact to some extent the purchase description and the basket of goods.
We trust this information was of interest to you. Should you have any additional questions about furniture testing or packaging testing we invite you to contact us today. It will be our pleasure to answer your questions.
My career has been focused on simulating real life in the lab under controlled yet accelerated conditions. My passion for lab testing lead me to start Micom Laboratories Inc. 16 years ago. Through time I made sure Micom has the necessary equipment to simulate various environmental parameters such as the sun, vibrations, heat, cold, thermal shocks and humidity. I wanted to be able to move things back and forth, apply stresses to the products and materials we test and see how they react to the various stimuli. To do so we test products and materials against known standards and specifications (certification) and in many cases by creating my own test protocols and specifications (this is the cherry on top of the sundae…). This is what led me to participate in many standards writing committees and to become chairman of some of these committees.